South Korean Actress Nana and Mother Set to Testify in Violent Home Invasion Trial Following Counter-Suits

Nana and her mother will appear as witnesses in court to refute false claims made by a home intruder who accused the actress of attempted murder.

By: AXL Media

Published: Mar 28, 2026, 8:23 AM EDT

Source: Information for this report was sourced from allkpop

Judicial Proceedings Move to Third Hearing Phase

The Namyangju branch of the Uijeongbu District Court has scheduled a pivotal third hearing for April 21 in the ongoing criminal case against an unnamed man in his 30s. The defendant, currently held in state custody, faces severe charges of robbery and causing bodily injury following a violent breach of a private residence. Legal representatives for the actress confirmed on March 28 that Nana and her mother have officially cleared their professional schedules to participate as key witnesses. This appearance is viewed by the legal community as a decisive move to stabilize the prosecution’s narrative following several procedural delays.

Controversial Counter-Claims and Legal Retaliation

The case is marked by a rare legal maneuver in which the suspect filed a counter-complaint against the victims. The intruder alleged that Nana’s physical efforts to defend her home and mother constituted aggravated assault and attempted murder. However, investigators at the Guri Police Station dismissed these claims earlier this year, citing a complete lack of supporting evidence and the clear context of self-defense. In response to these allegations, Nana’s legal team has initiated a separate counter-lawsuit for false accusations, seeking to hold the defendant accountable for what they describe as malicious litigation.

Disputes Over Intent and Physical Evidence

During the initial phase of the trial in January, the defendant admitted to the act of trespassing but vehemently denied any intent to commit robbery. His defense strategy rests on reclassifying the incident as simple theft, a charge that carries significantly lighter sentencing than armed robbery and battery. The situation is further complicated by the suspect’s refusal to consent to certain items of evidence submitted by the prosecution. Under South Korean procedural law, this refusal can prevent the court from considering specific physical evidence, thereby elevating the importance of direct oral testimony from the victims.