Nasarawa power struggle threatens APC stability as Sule and Al Makura rivalry intensifies

The political rift between Governor Abdullahi Sule and Tanko Al-Makura threatens APC unity and President Tinubu’s electoral strength in Nasarawa State.

By: AXL Media

Published: Apr 6, 2026, 3:38 AM EDT

Source: Information for this report was sourced from THISDAYLIVE

A Developing Crisis of Leadership in Nasarawa

The political landscape in Nasarawa State is currently defined by a high stakes rivalry between the incumbent Governor, Abdullahi Sule, and his predecessor, Senator Tanko Al Makura. What began as a local power tussle has evolved into a significant liability for the All Progressives Congress (APC), threatening to fragment the party’s foundational support. Observers note that the friction stems from a classic struggle between a former leader attempting to maintain legacy influence and an incumbent asserting his constitutional authority.

Disputes Over Zoning and Party Unity

At the center of the discord is Senator Al Makura’s reported move to bypass established zoning formulas that have historically preserved peaceful coexistence among the state's diverse stakeholders. Critics argue that by mobilizing internal divisions and championing conflicting rhetoric, the former Governor is creating a polarized environment. This departure from party norms has introduced a level of volatility that local leaders fear will suppress voter enthusiasm and create a leadership vacuum at the grassroots level.

Shifting Loyalties and Administrative Friction

In an effort to ensure a smooth transition, Governor Sule initially allowed many of his predecessor’s appointees to remain in their positions. However, this gesture of continuity has backfired as a source of tension. While many of these officials have since transitioned their loyalty to the current administration, Al Makura is accused of maintaining a parallel authority structure. By continuing to position himself as the primary arbiter of party affairs, the former Governor has created a confusing dual leadership narrative that complicates the party’s decision making process.