"I Will Reply with 15 Lawsuits": Billionaire Blord Derides VeryDarkMan’s Lawyer Over ₦1 Billion Defamation Claim

Billionaire Blord reacts to VeryDarkMan’s lawyer filing a ₦1 billion defamation suit. From "ex-convict" slurs to Ratel Pay billboards, the feud intensifies.

By: AXL Media

Published: Mar 24, 2026, 5:39 AM EDT

Source: The information in this article was sourced from Legit.ng

The ₦1 Billion Slur: "Ex-Convict" Allegations

The legal friction between billionaire entrepreneur Linus Williams (Blord) and social media activist Martins Vincent Otse (VeryDarkMan) has reached a new peak. Marshall Abubakar, the legal representative for VDM, officially filed a ₦1 billion defamation suit against Blord on Tuesday, March 24, 2026. The lawsuit stems from comments where Blord allegedly referred to VDM as an "ex-convict." VDM’s legal team maintains that this characterization is false, malicious, and designed to damage the activist’s reputation, leading to the massive claim for damages.

Blord’s Defiant Response: "15 Counter-Lawsuits"

Blord took to his Instagram story on Monday, March 23, to mock the lawsuit and VDM’s legal strategy. In a scathing post, he questioned the competence of Marshall Abubakar, suggesting the lawyer was "not wise at all" to file such a claim. Blord hinted that he is prepared for a protracted legal war, threatening to respond to the single suit with fifteen separate legal actions. "You go need other lawyers to help you," Blord taunted, signaling that he has no intention of settling the matter out of court or retracting his statements.

The Billboard Paradox: Marketing Amidst Malice

The lawsuit comes at a confusing time for followers of both men. Just weeks prior, Blord unveiled a massive billboard for his new "Ratel Pay" app featuring VDM’s face. Despite their history of mutual accusations—dating back to 2024 when VDM accused Blord of fraudulent crypto practices—VDM surprisingly accepted the unauthorized use of his image. The "Ratel President" thanked Blord for the free publicity, framing the billboard as a "benefit to his personal brand" rather than a violation of image rights. This pivot from VDM initially suggested a thaw in their relationship, which has now been shattered by the current defamation suit.