Trial Date Scheduled for Former Patriots Receiver Stefon Diggs Following Felony Strangulation and Assault Allegations

Former Patriots wide receiver Stefon Diggs will stand trial in May for felony strangulation. Read the details of the alleged assault and the defense's response.

By: AXL Media

Published: Apr 2, 2026, 4:25 AM EDT

Source: Information for this report was sourced from Boston.com

Judicial Timeline Established for High Profile Case

The legal proceedings against former NFL star Stefon Diggs reached a new milestone Wednesday as a judge finalized the schedule for his upcoming trial. Diggs is slated to appear in Dedham District Court on May 4 to answer for a violent encounter that allegedly took place late last year. This scheduling follows a period of procedural delays, including a postponed arraignment that allowed the athlete to participate in Super Bowl LX. As the trial date approaches, the court will begin the process of seating a jury to weigh the felony charges brought by local prosecutors.

Allegations Involve Violent Financial Dispute

The criminal charges center on a December 2 incident at Diggs’s residence involving his personal chef. According to police reports and court documentation, the dispute originated over unpaid wages for services rendered. The complainant told Dedham investigators that during the confrontation, Diggs struck her across the face and attempted to choke her using his arm. While the alleged victim did not immediately seek charges, a formal report was filed with the police department two weeks later, leading to the current felony indictment for strangulation or suffocation.

Defense Maintains Allegations are Fabricated

Legal counsel for the former wide receiver has issued a forceful rejection of the prosecution’s narrative. Attorney David Meier stated that Diggs categorically denies the assault ever took place, characterizing the claims as unsubstantiated and uncorroborated. The defense argues that the timing of the police report suggests a retaliatory motive linked to the ongoing financial disagreement between the employer and employee. According to Meier, the allegations were manufactured as a direct result of a compensation dispute that was not resolved to the chef’s satisfaction.