Tech Entrepreneur and RHOM Guest Star Jody Glidden Arrested on Felony Communication Interception Charge

Jody Glidden, ex-boyfriend of RHOM star Lisa Hochstein, faces felony charges for allegedly intercepting oral statements of Lenny Hochstein during divorce battle.

By: AXL Media

Published: Apr 15, 2026, 10:00 AM EDT

Source: People

Arrest and Formal Charges in Miami-Dade

Jody Glidden was arrested on Sunday, April 12, and charged with one count of interception of wire, oral, or electronic communications. According to court records, the 53 year old tech entrepreneur was released shortly after his booking on a $5,000 bond. By the following day, Glidden had filed a formal plea of not guilty, waiving his personal appearance for the upcoming arraignment and opting for a trial by jury. The Miami-Dade State Attorney’s Office has confirmed the arrest but noted that specific arrest materials remain shielded from public view at this time.

Connection to the Hochstein Divorce Battle

The criminal charges appear to stem from a March 19 filing that named both Glidden and Lisa Hochstein as co-defendants. The documentation alleges that between March 12, 2023, and March 31, 2023, the pair intentionally intercepted or procured the interception of oral statements made by Lisa’s ex-husband, famed plastic surgeon Leonard “Lenny” Hochstein. This timeframe coincides with the most volatile period of the Hochsteins' legal separation. While Glidden has been processed through the criminal justice system, online records do not currently indicate a recent arrest for Lisa Hochstein, despite her previous listing as a co-defendant in the initial filing.

Transformative Analysis: The Criminalization of Matrimonial Discord

This case highlights an escalating trend where the aggressive tactics of high stakes divorce cross into criminal territory. In Florida, the Interception of Wire, Oral, or Electronic Communications Act is a "two-party consent" law, making it a third-degree felony to record a private conversation without the permission of all participants. By moving this dispute from a family court motion to a criminal felony charge, prosecutors are signaling a zero tolerance approach to illegal surveillance in domestic litigation. This development serves as a stark warning to litigants and their associates that "gathering evidence" through electronic eavesdropping can carry prison time and permanent criminal records, far outweighing any perceived advantage in a settlement.