Nigerian Defence Headquarters pledges impartial military trial for 36 personnel accused of coup attempt

Defence Headquarters trials 36 soldiers for mutiny in Abuja. Major General Uba promises fair hearings amid tight security and closed-door sessions.

By: AXL Media

Published: Apr 24, 2026, 10:17 AM EDT

Source: Information for this report was sourced from News Diary Online

Inauguration of Military Tribunal in Abuja

The Nigerian Defence Headquarters has officially commenced a General Court Martial to address grave allegations of mutiny and national security breaches involving 36 serving military personnel. According to Major General Samaila Uba, the Director of Defence Information, the tribunal was established specifically to try those suspected of participating in attempts to overthrow the current administration. This move follows a preliminary investigation and a formal announcement made in late January, signaling a significant escalation in the government's efforts to reinforce internal discipline and safeguard the nation's democratic stability.

Assurances of Judicial Transparency and Fairness

During the inauguration, the military leadership emphasized its commitment to conducting the trial with the highest standards of impartiality and fairness. Major General Uba stated that the proceedings will strictly adhere to the extant legal frameworks of the military justice system, ensuring that the rights of all accused personnel are respected. The Defence Headquarters maintains that the goal of the court martial is to guarantee that justice is served without fear or favor, reinforcing the principles of due process even within the unique confines of a military tribunal.

Tight Security Measures at Trial Venue

The 36 accused officers arrived at the Guards Brigade Scorpion Mess in Asokoro under heavy military escort on Friday morning. Security arrangements were exceptionally tight at the venue, reflecting the sensitive nature of the charges involving state security and alleged subversion. Despite the heavy presence of civil lawyers representing the accused, the proceedings were held behind closed doors. This level of security highlights the perceived severity of the threat and the military’s intent to maintain absolute control over the environment during the high stakes trial.