ICC Rejects Duterte’s Bid to Unmask Prosecution Witnesses Before Landmark Hearing
The ICC Pre-Trial Chamber rules that witness safety takes precedence over defense transparency, denying Rodrigo Duterte's bid to unmask prosecution witnesses.
By: AXL Media
Published: Feb 23, 2026, 5:02 AM EST
Source: Information for this report was sourced from Philippine Daily Inquirer

The Judicial Ruling on Confidentiality and Safety
In a six-page decision issued by Pre-Trial Chamber I, the ICC clarified that the principle of public proceedings is not absolute when balanced against the lives of those testifying. The defense team, led by international counsel Nicholas Kaufman, had petitioned the court on February 16, 2026, to lift redactions on the prosecution’s witness list. Kaufman argued that much of this information was already known within the Philippines and that keeping it redacted hindered the defense's ability to challenge evidence publicly. However, the chamber, composed of Judges Iulia Motoc, Reine Alapini-Gansou, and María del Socorro Flores Liera, maintained that confirming or denying the identities of these individuals would heighten the security risks they and their families face.
Defense Limitations and Ethical Mandates
The court emphasized that the current redactions do not prevent the former president’s legal team from challenging the reliability or admissibility of evidence. Instead, the judges reminded the defense of their professional obligations under the ICC’s Code of Professional Conduct. The ruling explicitly instructed Duterte’s lawyers to respect professional secrecy and to request private sessions should they need to address sensitive or confidential information during the oral arguments. This directive ensures that while the defense can still perform its duty, it cannot inadvertently or intentionally compromise the safety of individuals who have come forward to provide testimony against the former administration.
Transformative Analysis: The High Stakes of Witness Security
The ICC's refusal to unmask witnesses is a strategic move that acknowledges the volatile political climate in the Philippines. In international human rights law, "redaction" is a standard tool used when a defendant once held absolute power over the state apparatus. By denying this request, the ICC is signaling to other potential witnesses that the court is a secure venue, which is critical for the prosecution’s case. If witnesses feel their identities are protected, they are more likely to provide the granular detail necessary to link high-level policy to ground-level executions. This ruling essentially safeguards the integrity of the evidence pool before the case even reaches a full trial.
Categories
Topics
Related Coverage
- ICC Begins Confirmation of Charges Hearing for Former President Rodrigo Duterte
- International Criminal Court pretrial chamber evaluates evidence against Rodrigo Duterte following four day hearing
- ICC Appeals Chamber Rejects Duterte’s Jurisdiction Challenge Paving Way for Crimes Against Humanity Trial
- International Prosecutors Alleged Systematic Command by Duterte in Lethal Drug Campaign