Environmental Damage from Cruise Ships "Not Worth the Benefit," Expert Warns
Experts and tourism leaders clash over the impact of cruise ships, with new research suggesting Fiordland receives 69% of passengers but 0% of their spending.
By: AXL Media
Published: Apr 29, 2026, 7:10 AM EDT
Source: RNZ Pacific

The "Zero Spending" Paradox in Fiordland
Professor James Higham of Griffith University, a specialist in sustainable tourism, highlighted a significant imbalance in how cruise revenue is distributed. His 2024 research focused on Fiordland, a primary destination for the industry.
Passenger Volume: Fiordland receives 69% of all New Zealand cruise passengers.
Economic Return: Because Milford Sound lacks the infrastructure for ships to dock, passengers remain on board, resulting in 0% spending in the local area.
National Impact: Nationwide, cruise tourism accounts for 9% of international arrivals but only 1% to 3% of total tourism expenditure.
The "Scrubber" Controversy: Air vs. Sea Pollution
Categories
Topics
Related Coverage
- High Tide, Low Value? Experts Question Economic Worth of Cruise Tourism
- Fiji Police Launch CID Investigation into $150,000 Corruption Allegations and Seizure of Journalist Equipment
- Reserve Bank of Fiji Issues Economic Warning as Global Geopolitical Tensions Threaten 2026 Growth Outlook
- Fiji Records Negative 1.5 Percent Average Annual Inflation Amid Surge in April Transport Costs