Department of Justice Unveils Missing FBI Memos Detailing Uncorroborated Sexual Assault Allegations Against President Trump

The DOJ has released missing FBI memos detailing uncorroborated 1980s sexual assault claims against President Trump. Read about the FBI's 2019 interviews.

By: AXL Media

Published: Mar 6, 2026, 6:17 AM EST

Source: The information in this article was sourced from The News Tribune

Recovery of Missing Investigative Memos

In a significant update to the public record surrounding the late Jeffrey Epstein, the Department of Justice (DOJ) released a collection of FBI documents on Thursday, March 5, 2026. These specific pages consist of typewritten notes from four separate interviews conducted in 2019. The documents had been absent from the massive trove of investigative files released earlier this year, a discrepancy that had drawn sharp criticism from lawmakers and victims' advocates who questioned the completeness of the government’s transparency efforts.

Details of the Accusations

The newly public memos recount the testimony of a woman who came forward shortly after Epstein’s federal sex trafficking arrest in the summer of 2019. According to the FBI summaries, the woman alleged she was sexually assaulted by both Epstein and Donald Trump. The claims regarding the President date back to the 1980s, when the accuser was a teenager. Federal officials have categorized these specific descriptions as part of a series of "uncorroborated assertions" found within the millions of pages produced under the Epstein Files Transparency Act.

Correction of "Duplicative" Coding Error

The absence of these three specific interview summaries—while a fourth, involving only Epstein, had been previously released—originally prompted the DOJ to claim the documents were merely duplicates found elsewhere in the files. However, a secondary review initiated following public pressure determined that the determination was incorrect. On Thursday, the Justice Department acknowledged that these memos, along with approximately a dozen other documents, had been "incorrectly coded" as duplicates and were, in fact, unique records that required disclosure.